Cambridge IELTS 14 Academic Writing Test 1

The pie charts illustrate the distribution of three unhealthy nutrients—sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar—across four typical meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks) in the USA.

Overall, dinner accounts for the largest proportion of sodium (43%) and saturated fat (37%) intake, while snacks contribute the highest percentage of added sugar (42%). Breakfast, on the other hand, consistently provides the lowest percentages of all three nutrients.

Looking more closely at sodium, dinner dominates with 43%, followed by lunch at 29%. Breakfast and snacks are tied at 14%. In terms of saturated fat, dinner once again takes the lead with 37%, while lunch contributes 26%, snacks 21%, and breakfast the least at 16%.

Regarding added sugar, snacks are the main contributor at 42%, with dinner and lunch providing 23% and 19% respectively. Breakfast accounts for the smallest portion of added sugar at 16%.

In conclusion, dinner is the largest source of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks are the primary source of added sugar in the typical American diet.

In life, individuals often face challenging circumstances, whether it be dissatisfaction with their job or financial difficulties. Some argue that accepting these situations is the best approach, while others believe that striving for improvement is more beneficial. Both perspectives offer valuable insights, but one may have a more positive impact than the other.

On the one hand, there are those who feel that accepting an unfavorable situation is a practical and realistic mindset. They argue that life is filled with uncertainties, and not every situation can be changed. For example, someone who is unhappy in their job might tolerate it if they need financial stability. From this viewpoint, acceptance allows individuals to avoid the stress of constantly pursuing change, especially when circumstances are beyond their control. Moreover, this approach promotes contentment, encouraging people to appreciate what they have rather than focusing on what they lack.

On the other hand, many people believe that it is essential to actively seek improvement in difficult situations. They argue that change is only possible when individuals take initiative. For instance, if someone is dissatisfied with their job, they could pursue further education or explore new career opportunities to improve their situation. Similarly, if a person struggles financially, they could seek additional income sources, such as freelancing or starting a side business. By striving for better conditions, individuals not only enhance their own well-being but also contribute to their personal growth. This approach fosters resilience, perseverance, and the pursuit of a better quality of life.

In my opinion, while acceptance has its place in situations that cannot be immediately changed, it is more advantageous to strive for improvement whenever possible. Settling for less can lead to long-term dissatisfaction, whereas taking action to improve one’s situation often leads to better opportunities and personal fulfillment. For example, in my own professional experience, I have witnessed colleagues leave unfulfilling jobs to pursue careers aligned with their passions, resulting in both increased job satisfaction and financial rewards.

In conclusion, although some may prefer to accept difficult situations, I believe that attempting to improve them offers greater benefits in the long run. With determination and effort, most challenges can be overcome, leading to a more fulfilling and successful life.